So I asked my 85 year
old dad: “what do you think of when I say ‘Green’ dad”. There was a brief
crackle on the phone and then came: “mould.” The generation gap on matters
Green is clear.
I have to admit that as a 43 year I too didn’t think of the practice
of making modern day sacrifices in order to conserve the rapidly depleting
fossil fuels, when the word Green came up. Rather I would think of someone new
on the job, who parks in the bosses bay on the first day, a ‘Green-horn’ if you
will, it’s best not to mix those two words up.
Or perhaps “Green Fingers”. I used to have “Green Fingers” when
I was more involved in our garden or is that having a Green Thumb? It means the
difference between getting anything to grow and creating a micro-desert.
But the search for a
Green definition remains elusive: The movement to green has been nearly a
thirty year process beginning in the 1970’s with the solar-energy craze. Early in the 1990’s for example, the green
building movement began to take hold.
Expanding our thinking and consideration for the larger picture of the
total environmental impact, thus driving demands for materials, commercial and
home designs offering reduced long term costs, healthier living, greater
efficiency and sustainability.
But for me Green is for gunge: Gangrene from war stories,
brave soldier who fought in the trenches and got the Dreaded Lurgy. Then
there’s the sludge down on Zoo Lake before the big clean-up of
whenever-it-was. Then there’s beautiful,
wonderful mucous. Oh yes, oh quivering parent – there were those nappies
that….never mind. Green gunge is every little boys early fascination until
puberty hits then green becomes just another colour.
One mini Green definition I heard somewhere, went something
like is this: “meeting the needs of the present without compromising the
ability of future generations to meet their needs.” A little whimsical with a
touch of daisy and shoo-wah, but pleasantly unimposing. I rather like it.
Depending on where you are applying the term Green, ‘sustainable
design’ may be a good substitute. True sustainability embraces a commitment to
see the world as interconnected, to understand the impact our actions have on
others and our environment, and to nurture the offspring of all species that
will inherit the planet. To become truly sustainable, it is vital to equally
address social sustainability, economic sustainability, and environmental
sustainability like three legs holding up a stool. Okay, a little preachy.
The truth is, the Green movement is now orthodoxy, mainstream,
convention if you like. It’s no longer the fringe realm of hippies and New Ages
or people with pony-tails in general. For example, Green construction is huge
in South Africa now and Green Stars are a coveted reward. It reminds me of my children when they were
of the age when a gold star on the forehead for good behaviour was the most
coveted award in preschool. Now we have pinstriped executives scurrying around
fulfilling the requirements of the Green Buildings Council so as to acquire
more Green Stars for their buildings.
As if Green building isn’t enough we have green nappies,
green fuels and green political parties. But a new interesting one I discovered
is “green-hypocrisy”. Green campaigners argue that cheap short-haul flights
have fuelled a massive hike in carbon emissions over the past few years. Celebrities
in particular are criticised for struggling to reconcile their well-meaning
efforts to develop green credentials and the demands of the modern world. Sienna Miller and Chris Martin preach the
importance of being 'green'. They recycle obsessively, insist on green nappies
and compost every scrap of organic vegetable peeling and they're not slow to
tell you about it. Yet they jet set the world over producing a carbon foot-print
bigger than the rest of us.
It’s tough at the
top. Looks like you can’t get away with anything these days. Did I say Carbon
Footprint, let me tell you what my 85 year old dad said when I asked him what
he thought of when I said Carbon Footprint….
No comments:
Post a Comment